Legal Opinion
Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Friedland
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 1978No. 2-676A242PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, P.J. —
Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc., (Bell) appeals from an interlocutory order which certified a class under Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 23. We obtained jurisdiction pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 4(B)(5).
Friedland, a practicing attorney in Indianapolis, filed a complaint on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. He challenges the validity of certain telephone rates and practices of Bell categorized under the heading of “joint user service”.
Bell had on file with the Public Service Commission an approved tariff schedule 1 pursuant to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Public Service Commission v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Ballman v. DuffecyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. White v. Hilgemann, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Austin Lakes Joint Venture v. Avon Utilities, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
- South Eastern Indiana Natural Gas Co. v. IngramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Thompson v. Medical Licensing BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. DozierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kentucky-Indiana Municipal Power Ass'n v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.