Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hanks

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1890No. 316PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This suit involves the title to certain lands in Arkansas, which the appellee, a married woman; claims to constitute her separate estate, and, as such, not liable for the debts of her husband, James M. Hanks.

By the laws of Arkansas.in force when the appellee and her husband were married, (Rev. Stat. Ark. 1858; Gould’s Dig. 765, c. Ill,) it was provided that (§ 1) “any married woman may become seized and possessed of any property, real and personal, by direct bequest, devise, gift or distribution in her own right and name and as of her own property: Provided, The same does, not come from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Watson v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Orton v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Pettit v. ShepherdNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  5. Davis v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rich v. BraxtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Davis v. CliffordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Moore v. McNuttWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API