Legal Opinion

Werner v. Sargeant

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1953No. Civ. 15813PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This is an action for unlawful detainer based on nonpayment of rent. The trial court entered a summary judgment against the defendant for restitution of the premises and for $2,400 for unpaid rent.

After the complaint was filed defendant demurred and, after the demurrer was overruled, answered, setting up several defenses. A motion to strike the major portions of this answer was granted on the ground that the stricken defenses could not be asserted in an unlawful detainer action. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to strike the remaining portions of the answer as sham and for a summary judgment,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Oil Well Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Whaley v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Ontario Downs, Inc. v. LauppeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API