Legal Opinion

State v. Naillieux

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 18, 2010No. 28310-1-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

241 P.3d 1280 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Michael A. NAILLIEUX, Appellant.

No. 28310-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

November 18, 2010.

Eric J. Nielsen, Jennifer M. Winkler, Nielsen, Broman & Koch, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

James Lyle Nagle, Office of the Pros. Attorney, Walla Walla, WA, Teresa Jeanne Chen, Attorney at Law, Soap Lake, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

¶ 1 We will review manifest constitutional error even if the appellant did not object or except in the trial court. However, the appellant must show error that is manifest in the record and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Adrian Munoz RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State Of Washington v. Adrian Munoz RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API