Legal Opinion
Ingvoldstad v. Kings Wharf Island Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided September 6, 1984No. Civ. No. 1983/36PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This case is before us on the motion of the plaintiff. She seeks, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4), to vacate the judgment entered herein, on the ground that it is illegal and void. The plaintiff makes a strong argument that certain actions taken by the Court during the course of proceedings and in the final judgment resulted in a void judgment. Because of this, she maintains, she has an absolute right to have the judgment vacated. We have carefully reviewed her assertions and the case law involved, and we disagree. The judgment was not void, and the motion will be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- In Re I/s Stavborg (O. H. Meling, Manager) v. National Metal Converters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ernest Dillon v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Miller & Miller Auctioneers, Inc. v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers International, L.P. (In Re Missouri Properties, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
- Higgins v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Perry v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Ingvoldstad by and Through Meyer v. Kings Wharf Island Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985