Legal Opinion

Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 16, 2015No. 12-592LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Indian Tribe Claims for Tribal Trust Fund Mismanagement; Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment; Fiduciary Duties to Indian Tribes; Breach of Trust; 25 U.S.C. § 164.

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHEELER, Judge.

Plaintiff, the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, is a federally recognized Indian nation. The Quapaw Tribe commenced this action on September 11, 2012 by filing a complaint for money damages arising from the Government’s alleged breach of fiduciary and trust obligations owed to the Quapaw Tribe. The complaint contains three causes of action.

On November 13,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Marriott International Resorts, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capstone Associated Services, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  2. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API