Legal Opinion

Agster v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 2005No. 04-15466PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge.

The parents and the representative of the estate of Charles J. Agster III (Ag-ster) brought this action against individuals and Maricopa County and Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (collectively, the County) for the death of Agster while in the custody of the County. In this interlocutory appeal, the County challenges the order of the district court compelling production of the mortality review conducted by Correctional Health Services. We hold that we have jurisdiction to consider the County’s claim of privilege, and we hold that federal law recognizes no privilege of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  3. Agster v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Dynamic Finance Corp. v. Chapter 11 Trustee Richard Kipperman (In Re North Plaza, LLC)District Court, S.D. California · 2008
  5. Montgomery v. eTreppid Technologies, LLcDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API