Legal Opinion

Herman v. World Fire & Marine Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1936No. Appeal, 94Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The discharge of a rule to strike off a plaintiff’s statement of claim, or amended statement of claim, and enter judgment of non pros, is an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies: Deardorff v. Continental Life Ins. Co., 297 Pa. 289, 146 A. 816; Stegmaier v. Keystone Coal Co., 232 Pa. 140, 81 A. 187; Scanlon v. Suter, 158 Pa. 275, 27 A. 963; Industrial Acceptance Corp. v. Sickler, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 152, 156; Security T. & T. Co. v. Welsh et al., 104 Pa. Superior Ct. 502, 504, 159 A. 227.. On the other hand, an appeal does lie from an order striking off a statement of claim…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Hocking v. Howard InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API