Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 22, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant left her employment as a service coordinator for a daycare agency without good cause because her school schedule interfered with her work hours. It is well settled that leaving employment in order to attend school does not constitute good cause for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of Jing Ying ZengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of CuttittoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AdorisioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API