Legal Opinion
Ceballos v. Shaughnessy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
This action has been brought pursuant to Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009, and the general jurisdictional provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1329, to review the administrative proceedings of the Immigration and Naturalization Service wherein plaintiff was found deportable but was permitted to depart voluntarily in lieu of deportation. The motion now before the Court is one by the defendant 1 to dismiss the complaint:
*31(1) for failure to state a claim;(2) for failure to name an indispensable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Belizaro v. Zimmerman. Delgado v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Paolo v. GarfinkelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- De Pinho Vaz v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Podovinnikoff v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ceballos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schuetzle v. DubaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1962