Legal Opinion

De Pinho Vaz v. Shaughnessy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 1953No. 22890_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents interesting procedural questions as to the remedy available to a concededly deportable alien who contends that he has been denied the opportunity to present evidence as to his eligibility for suspension of deportation under § 19(c) (2) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, formerly 8 U.S.C.A. § 155(c), now dealt with in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1254.

The plaintiff is a native and citizen of Portugal, 42 years old. He first entered the United States as a stowaway in 1940. He resided here until his departure under a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. De Pinho Vaz v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ceballos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estrada v. AhrensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Pedreiro v. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Clubhouse at Fairway Pines, L.L.C. v. Fairway Pines Estates Owners Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Luis Alvaro Ceballos (Y Arboleda) v. Edward J. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at the Port of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API