Legal Opinion

State v. Boulet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1940No. 28037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Predicated upon the statute (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2601 [P. C. § 8944]) which provides that

“Every person who, with intent to deprive or defraud the owner thereof— . . .
“ (3) Having any property in his possession, custody or control, as bailee, . . . servant, . . . agent, . . . shall . . . withhold or appropriate the same to his own use or to the use of any person, other than the true owner or person entitled thereto; . . „
“ . . . shall be guilty of larceny.”

the following information charging L. A. Boulet with the crime of grand larceny was filed in the superior court for Pierce county:

“That the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KnutsenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. PatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Charles v. Bellingham Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. Bautista v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API