Legal Opinion

Eitel v. Alford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 13, 1953No. 16688PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Isaac Alford and Georgia Alford, husband and wife, instituted this action against Paul T. Eitel and Mildred L. Eitel, his wife, upon their joint promissory note, and to foreclose, as real estate mortgages, two deeds of trust covering lands in El Paso and Elbert counties. These lands, Eitel had purchased from Alfords; the note represented the unpaid balance of the purchase price; and the deeds of trust were to secure payment of said note, with interest and charges thereon. Plaintiffs also demanded judgment against defendants in remuneration of the 1948 taxes levied against said lands which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. BissellOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Armijo v. NucholsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wark v. BoppSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  4. Fabian v. Alphonzo E. Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Gordon Tiger Mining & Reduction Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. US Fax Law Center, Inc. v. Henry Schein, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Ellis Canning Company v. BernsteinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1972
  3. Ruff v. Yuma County Transportation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Edington v. Creek Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kacirek v. ManganColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API