Legal Opinion

Brother v. Brother

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 23, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the probate court appointing the appellee as personal representative of the decedent. The order was based upon a finding that the appellee was the surviving spouse of the decedent and therefore had priority over the appellant, an heir,1 for appointment as personal representative. A.R.S. § 14-3203(A).

The decedent and the appellee were married on May 8, 1978. That marriage was dissolved by a decree of dissolution entered on April 18, 1979. Almost eight months *537later, on December 11, 1979, the decedent and the appellee jointly petitioned for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Breinig v. BreinigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Gustafson v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage Of: Bollermann v. NowlisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Darby v. DarbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In the Matter of Terrie Harman and Thomas McCarronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  4. Darby v. DarbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API