Legal Opinion

Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 2019No. 18-cv-1646PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., United States District Judge *455I. INTRODUCTION

In this fire insurance claim dispute, two commercial buildings with separate street addresses were connected by a covered walkway. A fire destroyed one of the buildings, but not the other. The business operating out of the two addresses had a commercial insurance policy issued by Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company and sought coverage for the damage to the building. The parties, the business's assignee and the insurer, do not dispute that the commercial policy covered damage to the building that did not burn down. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matthew Dundon, as the Trustee of the Endo General Unsecured Creditors’ Trust v. Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  2. REPA v. NAPIERKOWSKIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API