Legal Opinion
Krislov v. Rednour
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 6, 1997No. 96 C 674PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The named plaintiffs, Clinton A. Krislov and Joan A. Sullivan, brought suit on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated individuals against the defendants, officials of the Illinois State Board of Elections (“State Board of Elections”),' claiming that certain ballot-access provisions of the Illinois Election Code (“Election Code”) and procedures employed by the State Board of Elections violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Both sides move for summary judgment on the issue of whether the Election Code provision requiring…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jenness v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Party of Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krislov, Clinton A. v. Rednour, Wanda L.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Clinton A. Krislov, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, and Joan A. Sullivan v. Wanda L. Rednour, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, Hannelore Hulsman, Vice Chairman of the State Board of Elections, Ronald D. Michaelson, Executive Director of the State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000