Mehoves v. Mehoves

amount respondent had deducted from her spousal support obligation for one child's oral surgery and orthodontics over the preceding months, arguing that such expenses were not medically necessary. On July 20, 2011, the district court entered an order denying the motion. Appellant appeals from that order. On appeal, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that the expenses associated with the oral surgery and orthodontics were medically necessary and that he should not be responsible for those expenses because respondent took the children to out-of-service…