Lake v. State

. Keller, P.J.',

announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which

Keasler, Hervey and Richardson, JJ., joined.

We must decide whether the denial of 'closing argument at a community-supervision revocation proceeding is the sort of error that is exempt-from a harm analysis. We conclude that it is not, because the Supreme Court has not labeled it as structural. Consequently, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case for a harm analysis.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Trial

' A jury found appellant' guilty of sexual assault of a child under age seventeen and assessed a…