Legal Opinion
Brick v. Conti (In re Conti)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 16, 2017No. BK 13-12065 CLB; AP 15-01029 CLBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
Bucki, U.S.B.J.
The remaining defendants in this adversary proceeding have moved to dismiss two causes of action that seek to avoid allegedly fraudulent conveyances. Central issues include whether the applicable statute of limitations precludes recovery, and whether a fraudulent conveyance can arise from payment of expenses for the benefit of oneself and one’s dependants.
Robert R. Conti is a physician who has lived for more than fourteen years with his wife Susan and their children in a house at 74 Earldom Way in the Town of Amherst, New York. Prior to June 17, 2003, Dr. and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Jackson ex dem. Merrick v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Deere v. Contella (In Re Contella)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- Citicorp Trust Bank v. MakkasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wallach ex rel. Bankruptcy for Northstar Development Corp. v. Buchheit (In re Northstar Development Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nathan v. Libra (In re Libra)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- In Re: Michelle A. VealeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022