Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Hon. chavez/state

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 22, 2014No. 1 CA-SA 13-0299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 Michael Jimenez petitions for special action relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion to preclude evidence untimely disclosed by the state. Jimenez contends that the court’s failure to preclude the evidence forced him to request a continuance that extended trial beyond the Rule 8 speedy-trial deadline, to enable him to prepare his defense. We accept jurisdiction and grant relief. We hold that when the state delays disclosure of inculpatory evidence in violation of Ariz. R.Crim. P. 15.6, a continuance that delays trial beyond a defendant’s last day under Rule…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. State v. HargettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  3. Earl v. Hon. garcia/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Earl v. Hon. garcia/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API