Jimenez v. Hon. chavez/state
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 Michael Jimenez petitions for special action relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion to preclude evidence untimely disclosed by the state. Jimenez contends that the court’s failure to preclude the evidence forced him to request a continuance that extended trial beyond the Rule 8 speedy-trial deadline, to enable him to prepare his defense. We accept jurisdiction and grant relief. We hold that when the state delays disclosure of inculpatory evidence in violation of Ariz. R.Crim. P. 15.6, a continuance that delays trial beyond a defendant’s last day under Rule…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. HargettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Earl v. Hon. garcia/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Earl v. Hon. garcia/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015