Legal Opinion
Hassler, Inc. v. Shaw
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 10, 1926No. 278PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is a writ of error upon a judgment in personam against the plaintiff in error' on the ground that there never was any valid service of process against it and that therefore there was no jurisdiction in the Court. The writ was transferred: from the Circuit Court of Appeals to this Court, the case being one in which the jurisdiction of the District Court and that alone was in issue within the meaning of § 238 of the. Judicial Code, under the decisions in Shepard v. Adams, 168 U. S. 618; Remington v. Central Pacific R. R. Co., 198 U. S. 95, and Board of Trade v. Hammond Elevator Co., 198 U.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Practical Concepts, Inc. v. Republic of BoliviaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.