Legal Opinion

Banister v. Day

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2009No. 08-CA-835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.

| ¿This is a medical malpractice proceeding in which summary judgment was granted in favor of defendants/appellees Dr. Barrett J. Day, M.D. (“Dr. Day”) and the Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff/appellant Carlene Banister was treated for hyperthyroidism by the staff of Integrative Medical Services (“IMS”) in 2002. IMS was a clinic specializing in homeopathic treatment and other forms of alternative medicine. 2 The appellant alleges that she was introduced to Dr. Day during…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Pfiffner v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Perkins v. Entergy Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  5. Prince v. K-Mart Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goudia v. MannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Hoffman v. TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API