Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Theriot

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 2018No. 2017–CA–686; NO. 2017–CA–686 C/W 2017–CA–687PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, JUDGE PRO TEMPORE, J.

*299The judgment on appeal is the grant of a defense motion for summary judgment in two consolidated cases. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Plaintiff/appellant, Peter Hoffman, as successor in interest to Pool Boy the Movie, L.L.C. (Pool Boy) and Autopsy, L.L.C. (Autopsy), filed two separate lawsuits against John Theriot, CPA (Theriot) and Malcolm M. Dienes, L.L.C. (MMD) for negligence and professional malpractice. Because the two actions derive from the same set of facts and assert the same claims against the same defendants, the matters were consolidated in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  4. Joseph v. DickersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Calandro Development, Inc. v. RM Butler Contr., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vinson Pulliam v. Curahealth New Orleans, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API