Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Soo Line Railroad
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case involves an errant interstate rail shipment of waste material in twenty-one open-topped gondola cars. The plaintiff, the Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company (“B & OCT”), has filed a multicount complaint to recover its expenses in handling eighteen of the cars while they were on its Chicago terminal property. B & OCT’s expenses included building covers for the cars to prevent rain from washing out the contents, and securing the railcars to protect the public. B & OCT also seeks demurrage charges from…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- United States v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Zazzali v. VitalCore Health Strategies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025