Legal Opinion

United States v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 6, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 85-502 MMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON THE GLOBE NEWSPAPER COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

In August 1985, plaintiff United States of America brought an action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (“CERC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9657 (1982), seeking reimbursement of response costs for the clean-up of hazardous wastes at the Sealand disposal site in Delaware. On August 7, 1986 Conrail and other defendants filed an amended third-party complaint adding third-party defendant The Globe Newspaper Company (“Globe”) and others. The third-party plaintiffs sought…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API