Legal Opinion
Bailey v. USX Corp.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided April 24, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-AR-1275-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
Keith Bailey complains that his former employer, USX Corporation, retaliated against him in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Bailey alleges that the form the reprisal took was an adverse comment by a USX supervisor to Bailey’s prospective employer after Bailey’s termination. Bailey claims that this adverse comment was a reaction to Bailey’s previous charge against USX of sex discrimination.
After trial the parties were given leave to file post-trial briefs on or before April 17, 1987. USX filed such a brief on April 17,1987. Bailey…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lucille Qualls Woods v. Dunlop Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Keith D. Bailey v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Yaba v. RooseveltDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Caudill v. Farmland Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
- Booth v. Quantum Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996