Legal Opinion

New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1959No. 132-55PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff sues to recover $7,-200 which the Government’s agency, the United States Maritime Commission, charged it for “desirable features” on two ships which the plaintiff bought from the Maritime Commission. Our decision in A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. United States, 108 F.Supp. 95, 123 Ct.Cl. 520, was to the effect that, in circumstances such as those here present, the “desirable features” charge was improper. On the merits, then, the plaintiff is entitled to recover if the merits are reached.

The Government pleads the statute of limitations, and also a counterclaim. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jerome S. Spevack v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. American Export Lines, Inc. v. United States. New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Burleigh House Condominium, Inc. v. BuchwaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. United States v. Waterman Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API