Legal Opinion

Olson v. Dow Corning Corp., No. Bik-Cv93-0520081s (Feb. 24, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 24, 1995No. BIK-CV93-0520081SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Two motions to dismiss have been filed in this action, the first by Patrick Felice, M.D., and Associated Plastic Reconstructive Surgeons, P.C. (the "Corporation") and the second by Bruce E. Burnham, M.D. All three defendants claim improprieties in service of process.

The first contention of both Dr. Felice and Dr. Burnham is CT Page 1486-H that they were not served with the summons and complaint at any time. The sheriff's return and his affidavits state that each doctor was served through abode…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Uyen Phan v. DelgadoConnecticut Superior Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API