Legal Opinion

Dolores v. Gustafson

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 25, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

Summary judgment was entered for the defendants on the plaintiffs’ claims that they were entitled under G.L.c. 185, §15B(7) to recover three times the amount of their security deposit, plus costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, for the defendants' violations of the Massachusetts security deposit law.3 We must decide on *268this interlocutory appeal4 whether, in light of the Appeals Court’s October 15, 2009 decision in Taylor v. Beaudry, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2009), the motion judge properly applied Castenholz v. Calm, 21 Mass. App. Ct. 758 (1986) in allowing summary judgment for the defendants.

In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. White v. Peabody Construction Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Chavoor v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Williams v. HartmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. FiumaraMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
  2. Kavlakian v. Pinette Group, LLCMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Melo v. VillarconMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API