Legal Opinion

State v. Emery

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1992No. L900163CR; CA A69343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant has petitioned for review of our decision that affirmed his conviction for illegal possession of a game mammal. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and allow it.

Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint filed against him, arguing that he had been denied his right to a speedy trial under ORS 135.747 and Article I, section 10 of the Oregon Constitution. After his motion was denied, he was convicted. On appeal, we held that he was not denied his right to a speedy trial under the circumstances. We said:

“Here, the delay is not of such length that it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SchiffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. MoylettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. CogginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. MoylettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API