Legal Opinion
Van Horne v. Treadwell
California Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1913No. S.F. No. 6101PublishedCited by 19 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The court below sustained demurrers to the complaint, granting plaintiff leave to amend. No amendment having been filed within the time allowed, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.
The complaint alleges the following facts: On June 30, 1910, plaintiff, who was then and has ever since been the owner of three thousand five hundred shares of the capital stock of the Sutter Hotel Company, pledged said shares to defendant Reese to secure the payment of a loan of two thousand dollars. In February, 1911, plaintiff, with Reese’s consent, pledged said shares to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abbott v. the 76 Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Commerce Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Bracken v. . Atlantic Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by19 opinions
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.