Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1936No. [No. 28, April Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The appellant, Frank L. Durkin, is a member in good standing of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, a fraternal beneficiary society, hereinafter referred to as the Brotherhood, his contract with which consists of his application for membership, application for beneficiary certificate, the certificate, and the constitution of the Brotherhood. Prior to August 18th, 1933, Durkin made a claim for disability benefits, alleging he had suffered a total and permanent disability. This claim was denied by the general secretary and treasurer of the Brotherhood, and appellant thereafter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anacosta Tribe, No. 12 v. MurbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  2. Osceola Tribe, No. 11 v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  3. Donnelly v. Supreme CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. Long v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Weigand v. Fraternities Accident OrderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Walker v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Gallagher v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API