Legal Opinion

McCord v. Southern Distributing Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1962No. 10947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

The principal question presented by this appeal, and the only one determined by us, is whether or not Alfred F. Schmidt, an employee of appellee Southern Distributing Company, was acting within the scope of his employment when he assaulted appellant, Q. W. McCord. It is our opinion, under the authority of Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Hagenloh, 151 Tex. 191, 247 S.W.2d 236, that he was not so acting, and that the judgment of the Trial Court should be affirmed.

The suit was against the employee, Schmidt, and his employer, Southern Distributing Company. ' Trial was to a jury which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HagenlohTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. HT Cab Company v. GinnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buck v. Blum, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Durand v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Rosales v. American Buslines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Dart v. Yellow Cab, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Belinda Buck v. Phillip S. Blum, Individually and D/B/A Houston Neurological Institute and Kimberly E. Monday, Indivdiually and D/B/A Houston Neurological Institute, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API