Solomon v. . Bates
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN of defendants to modify the language of the opinion in the cáse between same parties, ante.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
The opinion in this case having been filed and certified, the losing party served notice on the opposite side that on a day named he would move the Court to modify the opinion by striking out the words, “ Indeed the directors are liable for the injury caused by relying upon the statement issued by them which 'they did not know to' be true, as well as when they knew- it to be false,” and also the concluding words of the opinion, “As said above, it is not necessary that the directors should know that such reports are false. It is their duty to know that they are true.”
The respondent,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finn v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Townsend v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Herndon v. Imperial Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Cook v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Hauser v. . TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Houston v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- City of Durham v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Teeter v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.