Legal Opinion

Stanger v. Cato

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1987No. 73079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

While an invitee at appellee-defendant’s business establishment, appellant-plaintiff Mrs. Stanger fell. The fall was allegedly caused by appellee’s dog. Mrs. Stanger and her husband sued appellee for damages allegedly resulting from the fall. Appellee answered and subsequently moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee and appellants appeal.

Appellants urge that genuine issues of material fact remain as to appellee’s liability under two legal theories. They rely upon OCGA § 51-2-7, which provided, at the time relevant to this case,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Carla Gay Dress Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. McCree v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Fitzpatrick v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Wright v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Carr v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Hackett v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Pickard v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Freeman v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API