Legal Opinion

Travis v. McLaughlin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1976No. 7528SC995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Plaintiff's first argument is that the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense which must be pleaded in an answer and which may not ordinarily be raised by a Rule 12 motion. Plaintiff cites Iredell County v. Crawford, 262 N.C. 720, 138 S.E. 2d 539 (1964), and several other cases as support for her position. We note, however, that these cases were decided before 1967 and before the effective date of the Rules of Civil Procedure in North Carolina.

In Teague v. Motor Co., 14 N.C. App. 736, 189 S.E. 2d 671 (1972), the court was presented with the question of whether plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teague v. Asheboro Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Duke University v. ChestnutCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Iredell County v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Hargett v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Dew v. AppleberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cage v. Colonial Bldg. Co., Inc. of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API