Legal Opinion

Shelton v. Fairley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1984No. 8426SC164PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

The first issue concerns service of process on defendants Fairley, Monteith and Cobb. To exercise personal jurisdiction over a natural person, process must be served in compliance with N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 4(j)(1). “Where a statute provides for service of summons by designated methods, the specified requirements must be complied with or there is no valid service.” Long v. Board of Education, 52 N.C. App. 625, 626, 279 S.E. 2d 95, 96 (1981), quoting Broughton v. DuMont, 43 N.C. App. 512, 514, 259 S.E. 2d 361, 363 (1979), disc. rev. denied, 299 N.C. 120, 262 S.E. 2d 5…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Spilker v. HankinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Collier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Northwestern Financial Group, Inc. v. County of GastonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. MacK v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Fender v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Chrisalis Properties, Inc. v. Separate Quarters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API