Legal Opinion
Marvel v. Dannemann
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 29, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-351PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge:
This case involves the State of Delaware Judicial Pension Plan, Chapter 56 of Title 29 of the Delaware Code. Plaintiffs are two members of the state judiciary who, since 1976, have been required to contribute a larger amount of their salary to the judicial pension fund pursuant to the provisions of 60 Del.Laws c. 649 (1976), amending 29 Del.C. § 5601 (“the 1976 Amendment”). Plaintiffs claim that this Amendment is unconstitutional as to them as an impairment of the obligation of contracts, and have brought suit against the members of the Board of Pension…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Wagoner v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- McKenna v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.