Legal Opinion

SHADDY v. Department of Labor

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 3, 2009No. 2008-257Published

1Opinion of the Court

987 A.2d 311 (2009)

2009 VT 103

David SHADDY

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.

No. 2008-257.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

November 3, 2009.

Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND, JJ., REIBER, C.J. and BURGESS, Associate Justices.

ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1. Claimant David Shaddy appeals from an Employment Security Board determination that he was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he had been fired for gross misconduct connected with his work. We conclude that the administrative law judge abused his discretion by not issuing claimant's requested subpoenas and reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The following facts are undisputed.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Upper Valley Regional Landfill Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Harrington v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Keus v. Brooks Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. Langlois v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API