Legal Opinion

Brannon v. Pike

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1987No. 16396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether the Idaho Industrial Commission or the district court has jurisdiction to hear a claim by a client against his attorney for alleged breach of contract of representation in a workers’ compensation claim.

Subsequent to the disposition of his workers’ compensation claim before the Industrial Commission, Charles Brannon filed a complaint in district court against Emil Pike, his former attorney, alleging breach of contract and fraudulent alteration of the attorney employment contract. Brannon, had hired Pike to represent him in a workers’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Heese v. a & T TRUCKINGIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hancock v. HallidayIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Whitney v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Thompson v. Liberty National Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Curr v. CurrIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State, Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Lisby v. LisbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Afton Energy, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Afton Energy, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API