Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 2015No. B249505PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENDIX, J. *

Plaintiffs Corina Munoz and Keresha Edwards appeal from an order denying certification of a class of approximately 26,000 nonexempt California current and former employees of defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Chipotle), regarding what plaintiffs allege is Chipotle’s policy requiring employees to purchase slip-resistant shoes from a vendor, Shoes for Crews, in order to work at Chipotle’s restaurants. Plaintiffs further contend that Chipotle deducted the cost of these shoes from employee wages without obtaining the employee’s written authorization, these deductions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Cortez v. Doty Bros. Equip. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Fierro v. Landry's Rest. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Miranda v. Anderson Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Fierro v. Landry's Rest. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API