Miranda v. Anderson Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
Isidro Miranda (appellant) appeals from the trial court’s order compelling him to arbitrate his individual claim under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) and dismissing his representative PAGA claim. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that the “death knell” doctrine, which provides an exception to the one final judgment rule when an order allows a plaintiff to pursue individual but not class claims, applies to representative claims as well. In the unpublished portion we agree with appellant that a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cortez v. Doty Bros. Equip. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Allen v. San Diego Convention Center Corp., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Bray v. Charter Communications, Inc. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Cortez v. Doty Bros. Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.