Legal Opinion
O'MEARA v. Olson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1987No. C2-87-637PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellants Floyd Olson and National Real Estate Traders sued to enjoin cancellation of a contract for deed by respondents Thomas and Mary Ann O’Meara. The trial court enjoined the cancellation. Following trial on the merits to the court, the temporary restraining order was dissolved, the contract for deed was canceled and appellants were ordered to restore possession of the property to O’Mearas immediately. On appeal, Olson and National Real Estate Traders argue that the O’Mearas could not cancel the contract for deed without giving the notice required by Minn.Stat. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Bank of Milan v. SylteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- O'Connor v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Kirk v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Follingstad v. SyversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Sitek v. StrikerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Coddon v. YoungkrantzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Glenwood Investment Properties, L.L.C. v. Carroll A. Britton Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re HaakeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012