Monash v. Getz
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
The agreement alleged in paragraph three is to the effect that because of certain considerations named, the deceased promised to “leave her (i.e. the plaintiff) sufficient money at his death so that she would be amply provided for during her lifetime”; that described- as having been made by the defendant herein is substantially the same, viz., that he would “amply provide for her for the rest of her life.”
Reasons of demurrer one and two attack each of these alleged undertakings, respectively, on the ground that they are too vague and indefinite to be enforceable. The point does not seem well…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Folwell v. HowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Strakosch v. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
- Stempel v. Middletown Trust Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1939