Leganowicz v. Rone
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The hearing before the division of licenses was not a judicial proceeding and the charges, therefore, were not protected by an absolute privilege. They may, however, have a qualified privilege. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Allan & Allan Arts Ltd. v. RosenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. LefrakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Longo v. TaurielloNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Cheatum v. WehleNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Cheatum v. WehleNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.