Legal Opinion

Soursin v. Salorgne

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Lubke, J

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This was an action begun on the 18th of May, 1883.

Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he is a mechanic, skilled in the manufacturing and repairing of carriages, and that defendant was a carriage-maker, and on the 3d of March, 1882, engaged plaintiff as foreman and superintendent for a period of five years, at the rate of $35 a week, payable weekly ; that plaintiff entered the service of the defendant under this agreement, and with proper skill, performed the duties of his employment, so that there became due to him from defendant for his services and wages, for the week ending October 28,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colburn v. WoodworthNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Booge v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGee v. St. Joseph Belt Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Pape v. LathropIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Producers Packing Co. v. FischerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Brand v. Ogden-Howard Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1920
  5. Menges v. Milton Piano Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API