Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Verry v. Murray

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1935No. File No. 6303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

Plaintiff, a citizen of Ward county, seeks by mandamus to compel the respondents, respectively the county judge, clerk of the district court and the county auditor of said county, to convene as a redistricting board and redistrict the county pursuant to the provisions of § 3262, Comp. Laws 1913. Section 3262 provides: “The county judge, auditor and clerk of the district court of each county shall constitute a redistricting board with power to redistrict the commis sioner districts in any county whenever twenty-five per cent of the legal voters of the county, as shall be determined by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Uhl v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Little v. LanglieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Dorgan v. FiskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chester v. EinarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Judson PTO v. New Salem School BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ward County v. HalversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API