Legal Opinion
A & X, Inc. v. Common Council of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 16, 1979No. 77-4213, CA 12434PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
In this writ of review proceeding, appellants Dahl appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to vacate its judgment in plaintiff’s favor and quash the writ or, in the alternative, to permit them to intervene to make such a motion. We reverse and remand.
The plaintiff owned a city lot on which it wanted to build a duplex. To accomplish this, it needed a variance from the building set-back requirements of the city zoning ordinance. It applied to the City of Eugene for the necessary variance.
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a hearing on plaintiff’s request on March 31, 1977. Appellant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. City Council of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Thompson v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF COLUMBIACourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Williams v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Shanks v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Maizels v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Clinkscales v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019