Legal Opinion

Maizels v. Kozer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE OUEIAM.

This case arose in a controversy between two merchants over a trademark. The Hon. Sam A. Kozer, then Secretary of State, directed a cancellation of plaintiff’s trademark because, in his opinion, it was an infringement of a trademark to which A. Yolchok, the other merchant, was entitled. Plaintiff sued out a writ of review. The writ was not served on the opposing party to the proceeding before the Secretary of State, to wit: A. Yolchok. For this reason the Circuit Court was without juris diction to entertain the case: Or. L., § 609; Williams v. Henry, 70 Or. 466, 468 (142 Pac. 337).

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. City Council of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. A & X, Inc. v. Common Council of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. City Council of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API