United States v. Grace
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
I. Introduction
The difficult question presented now is what the Congress meant when it used the term “asbestos.” How the word is defined has significant legal ramifications in this criminal case. The definition of “asbestos” sets the parameters of the Clean Air Act’s criminal prohibitions and affects the likelihood that alleged conduct in this case will be deemed criminal. If the word “asbestos” as applied in the criminal law includes varieties of winchite and richterite the criminal case involved here is dramatically different than if “asbestos” is defined as the phrase has historically…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2006